عنوان مقاله [English]
Today organizations face great environmental turbulence. High levels of environmental turbulence can paralyze a firm’s operations. Actually outputs of organization process in such environments depend on the firm’s ability to change management and its flexibility. Since one of the important changes in the turbulent environments is changing of needs and preferences of customers and also based on new marketing approach, in order to consider customer's needs, customer agility has been identified as the vital competency for the survival of organizations. Given the critical role of customer agility in turbulent competitive environment, this concept has attracted many researchers of management science in recent years. Therefore, it is vital for organizations to find how to achieve this important capability and it is important to note that very few researches have been done in this regard. Since one of the important tools for achieving customer agility in the organization is dynamic capabilities, therefore in this research the model of formation of customer agility in organization based on dynamic capabilities has been proposed and examined in electronics industry of Iran. The model includes IT competencies, entrepreneurial and market acuity for improving the output of organizational process. This model has been developed based on three management areas of strategic management literature related to dynamic capabilities and the literature of entrepreneurship and information technology. Findings of the sample approve the research model. In addition, it is concluded that dynamic capabilities of the organization will help shaping customer agility and customer agility has a positive effect on quality and efficiency of the process output.
1. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., and Grover, V. 2003. "Shaping Agility through Digital Options:
Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms," MIS
Quarterly (27:2), June, pp. 237‐263.
2. Teece, D.J. 2007. "Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance," Strategic Management Journal (28:13), pp.1319-1350.
3. Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N., and Preiss, K. 1995,”Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations:
Strategies for Enriching the Customer”,New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
4. Cho, H., Jung, M., and Kim, M. 1996. "Enabling Technologies of Agile Manufacturing and Its
Related Activities in Korea," Computers and Industrial Engineering (30:3), pp. 323-335.
6. Bititci, U.S., Trevor, J.T., and Ball, P.D. 1999. "The Viable Business Structure for Managing
Agility," International Journal of Agile Management Systems(1:3), pp. 190-202.
7. Sharifi, H., and Zhang, Z. 1999. "A Methodology for Achieving Agility in Manufacturing
Organisations: An Introduction," International Journal of Production Economics(62:1-2),
8. Vernadat, F.B. 1999. "Research Agenda for Agile Manufacturing," International Journal of Agile
Management Systems(1:1), pp. 37-40.
9. Yusuf, Y.Y., Sarhadi, M., and Gunasekaran, A. 1999. "Agile Manufacturing: The Drivers, Concepts
and Attributes," International Journal of Production Economics (62:1-2), pp. 33-43.
and Attributes," International Journal of Production Economics(62:1-2), pp. 33-43.
Manufacturing Systems(19:4), pp. 267-281.
Logistics Networks," Computers in Industry(42:1), pp. 33-42.
Smes," International Journal of Technology Management (22:1), pp. 28-54.
System," Robotics and Computer‐Integrated Manufacturing(20:6), pp. 495-503.
Production Economics(100:2), pp. 285-299
of Information Technology," European Journal of Information Systems(15:2), pp. 120-131.
Agility and Implications for It," European Journal of Information Systems(15:2), pp. 132-145.
Role of It Infrastructure Capabilities," Journal of the Association for Information Systems(8:8), pp. 440- 462.
Applications: Antecedents in the Supply Chain Networks,"Information Technology and Management (9:1), pp. 5-19.
Perspective on Business Process Agility," Information Technology and Management(9:1), pp. 21-36.
Chain Agility for Risk Mitigation and Response," Journal of Operations Management(27:2), pp. 119- 140.
and measurement using a supply chain strategy lens”, Journal of operations management.
supply chain integration capabilities”, MIS Quarterly30, (2), 225-246.
A cross-case study",Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19 ,pp 28–38
29. Melville,N.,Kraemer, K., and Gurbaxani, V.,2004, "Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value', MIS Quarterly,28:2,pp.283-322
30. Dehning, B., and Richardson, V.J.,2002, " Returns on Investments in Information Technology: a Research Synthesis ", Journal of Information Systems, 16:1, pp:7-30
31. Matolcsy, Z.P., Booth,P., and Wieder,B. ,2005, "Economic Benefits of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Some Empirical Evidence, " Accounting and Finance, 45, pp.439-456
32. Saeed, K.A., Malhotra, M.K., and Grover, V,2005, "Examining the Impact of Inter organizational System on Process Efficiency and Sourcing Leverage in Buyer-Supplier Dyads", Decisions Sciences,36:3,pp.365-396
34. Christensen,C.M. “The innovator’s dilemma:when new technologies cause great firms to fail”, Harvard business school press, Cambridge, MA,1997.
Supply Chain Integration Capabilities," MIS Quarterly (30:2), June, pp. 225‐246.
Procurement: An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Manufacturing Firms," Information
Systems Research (18:1), pp. 103‐120.
empirical study. Strategic Management Journal 16 (1), 15–37.